Time Back Calculator

Estimate weekly team-hours you regain by fixing messy handoffs. Adjust the fields below with your own numbers.

Weekly Status Meeting

“Where is that?” Pings

Reopened Tasks

Handoff Stalls > 24h

Onboarding Mentoring

Costing (optional)

Hours regained / week
0.0
Estimated $ / week
$0

Method: ((status trim × attendees) + fewer pings + less rework + fewer stalls + onboarding) → weekly hours. Use your real numbers for a defensible claim.

Book a 15-minute Clarity Check Read: Cost of Chaos

Methodology & Sources

How the math works: Hours regained per week = (status meeting trim × attendees) + (fewer “where is that?” pings × minutes per ping ÷ 60) + (fewer reopened tasks × minutes per rework ÷ 60) + (avoided >24h handoff stalls × hours saved) + (onboarding mentor-time reduction × hires/month ÷ 4.33). Defaults are conservative—change the inputs to match your team.

  • Status & Meetings: Team-minutes are additive. Trimming a 60→45 min status with 6 people saves 1.5 hours/week.
  • Pings & Task Switching: Micro-interruptions carry restart costs; the default uses a conservative per-ping minute value you can adjust.
  • Rework Loops: Rework is a major productivity drain; capturing reopened tasks × minutes gives a grounded, team-specific estimate.
  • Handoff Stalls: Reducing wait states lowers lead time (see Little’s Law). This counts avoided >24h stalls × hours saved.
  • Onboarding: Mentor hours saved per new hire are spread across weeks (÷ 4.33). SHRM recommends tracking time-to-productivity.

Selected Sources

  • Gloria Mark et al., The Cost of Interrupted Work (CHI 2008). PDF
  • Gallup Business Journal (2006): interrupted work resumed in ~23 minutes. Article
  • Little’s Law (queueing theory) — relationship between WIP, throughput, and lead time. Overview
  • SHRM: Measuring onboarding success (time-to-productivity). Guide
  • Boehm & Basili (2001): rework & defect reduction insights. PDF